The Daily Crux

Friday, September 18, 2009

How the World's Best Investors See the Market By Porter Stansberry






The world's best investors don't see the market the way you do. And I mean that literally... They look at the market through different lenses. Most investors know how to value equities using various valuation ratios – like the price-to-earnings ratio, the price-to-book ratio, or dividend yields. These valuation studies are important when you're buying individual stocks. And they can give you some idea of whether or not the market as a whole is attractive. But... there are much better ways to see valuation in the markets. For example, here's a chart of the S&P 500 going back to 1975. This is the way you probably look at the market today. And when you look at the market this way, it appears pretty expensive. Stocks have been mostly going up for a long time. The recent big selloffs didn't bring the S&P 500 index back down all that much... or so it seems when you look at a plain chart.










But there's a much better and more accurate way to view the markets. The next chart is the S&P 500 again, from the same time period (starting in 1975). As you can see, this chart looks nothing like the first one. In this chart, you can plainly see the big top formed in stocks in the early 2000s. And you can see the huge mania of the 1990s – where the chart goes nearly straight up. But in this chart, the second top in stocks we saw in 2007 doesn't exist. It's like the bull market of 2002-07 never happened.


This chart is the S&P 500, but measured in gold, rather than U.S. dollars. What it shows is the value of stocks compared to gold. Gold is a much better standard of value than the U.S. dollar because it can't be printed or manipulated as easily as the U.S. dollar. What this second chart makes clear is how cheap stocks have really become – something you can't see on the regular S&P 500 chart because of the effects of inflation. At the bottom of stock prices in the late 1970s, just one ounce of gold (then at $800) would have bought an entire unit of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. Stocks and gold were trading on a one-to-one basis, based on this measure. At the peak of stock prices in 2000, a unit of the Dow was worth $14,000. And an ounce of gold was only worth $260. To buy the Dow would have cost more than 50 ounces of gold. Obviously, stocks were extremely expensive – 50 times more expensive than they were at the bottom in 1980. Today, gold is trading around $1,000 an ounce. And the Dow, at its recent low, was near 6,000. It would have taken roughly six ounces of gold to buy the Dow. Looking at stocks through the lens of gold gives you a much better idea of where we are in terms of sentiment and valuation. Using this gold ratio will help you make much better asset allocation decisions. You want to buy stocks when the ratio of the Dow to the price of gold is low – less than 10. And you want to buy gold when the ratio is high.

Using a chart just like this, my partner Bill Bonner began to tell people to buy gold and sell stocks in 2000. Using the same chart, I told Doug Casey's Gold Summit audience in March of this year to buy stocks instead of gold. While we may not yet be at the exact bottom of the gold-to-stock ratio, we're close. I'm not telling you to sell your gold. I'm not selling mine. But looking at the chart of stocks vs. gold, you can clearly see it's time to begin to fade gold and buy stocks. Good investing, Porter
P.S. This secret – knowing how to intelligently value assets – is one of the seven secrets of the world's best investors. I dedicated my most recent issue to these seven secrets... many of which I'm sure you've never heard of. I think it's the most important thing I've written all year. You can learn how to access this issue here.

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Sector rotation model

 

Sector rotation model

 


 

 

Yahoo's Sector Status 9/17/09

From this list it would seem like we are at the tail end of the Bear Market or near the Market Bottom as Finance and Utilities are priced in the single digits.

But the basic materials, consumer goods and technology are priced in the triple digits putting us closer to the market bottom.

 

















































































































Sectors1-Day Price Chg %Market CapP/EROE %Div. Yield %Debt to EquityPrice to BookNet Profit Margin (mrq)Price To Free Cash Flow (mrq)
Basic Materials2.04210872.29B72.2145.9632.956NA2.1283.224103.844
Conglomerates3.779337.70B10.813.22.388NA7.97.2183.1
Consumer Goods1.0192238.74B14.49116.672.413NA-1.0575.925454.416
Financial1.05217287.30B4.8542.8182.691NA1.374-4.86812.004
Healthcare0.8861915.38B55.64912.7662.343NA8.03310.65118.678
Industrial Goods1.729817.75B10.5499.7981.948NA2.2160.39686.794
Services1.2662624.40B19.3399.331.796NA7.2731.932.462
Technology0.7279328.28B17.32213.0821.465NA1.9237.66103.939
Utilities2.0771571.64B4.3164.3471.975NA1.5860.5941.256


Stockcharts Market Summary 9/17/09

From this list we see low Volatility showing complacency and everything else bullish.

The BPI's showing Energy leading the way pushing deeper into the middle of the sector model.


 

 

 

NYSE 9/17/09

Daily Prices are above the 200 day MA and the 40 week MA.  Bullish.

 

 

 





NYSE 9/17/09

Weekly prices are still below the 200 and 280 day MA. Bearish


 


 

 

NYSE PnF 9/17/09

Bullish

 

 



 

NYSE BPI Daily 9/17/09

Bullish

 

 

 NYSE BPI Weekly 9/17/09

 Bullish

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tuesday, May 6, 2008

Another Miracle Product? - yeshallknowthetruth | Google Groups

XPC for respiratory health?
Dr David Williams

Recommended dosages for Diamond V XPC vary significantly depending on the size of the animal. For example, a racehorse might be given 14grams a day, whereas an ostrich might be given only 3.5 grams a day. The company’s literature obviously doesn’t provide dosages for human use, but, if you use body weight as the determining factor, I would guess the dosage for an adult human would be somewhere in the ballpark of 2 to 3 grams a day. A child’s dosage would probably be anywhere from ½ to 1 gram a day.

Another Miracle Product? - yeshallknowthetruth Google Groups

Monday, January 28, 2008

Liquid Versus Tablet Discount Vitamins?

More info on the battle.

Liquid Versus Tablet Discount Vitamins?

riversideonline.com - Liquid vitamins vs. pills: Does one work better than the other?

The debate of questionable promotions of liquid vitamin miracles vs pills rages on. The MayoClinic.com claims no real benefits. With most consumables that are swallowed the question should be will the benefits survive past my stomach acid before it gets into my system?

riversideonline.com - Liquid vitamins vs. pills: Does one work better than the other?

Liquid vitamins vs. pills: Does one work better than the other?


Liquid vitamins vs. pills: Does one work better than the other?
Question
Do chewable and liquid vitamins work faster or better than vitamin pills that you swallow?
Katarzyna
Florida
Answer
Liquids and chewable tablets typically are absorbed by the body quicker than capsules or tablets, which are swallowed. This is because your stomach and intestines don't have as much to do to break them down. But this doesn't mean that liquid medications or chewable tablets work any better or are better for you than capsule or tablet forms. Also, usually with vitamins, faster absorption isn't an issue.
Related

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Dividend Based Investing

Dividend Based Investing


The Lure of Rising DividendsMarch 13, 2007 on 8:59 am In 3) Stocks No Comments

By Jeffrey R. KosnettFrom Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine, April 2007
Think of dividends and you may conjure up visions of carefree retirees using checks from utility stocks to pay for greens fees and trips to Hawaii. But dividend-paying stocks don't have to be stodgy. Whether you're 25 or 75, you can use dividend trends to flag solid growth companies run by managers who truly care about their shareholders. And how do you do that? Easy -- by finding companies that shower investors with more cash, year after year.
U.S. companies have plenty of money to share. Last year, they earned $1.8 trillion and "returned" $660 billion to stockholders. Two-thirds of that money flowed indirectly to investors when companies bought back their own stocks, a move designed to raise prices by spreading profits across fewer shares. However, companies often recycle many of the shares they buy back, giving them to employees and other holders of stock options. That practice can dilute the effect of the buyback.
But cash! Now there's a sure thing. And there's rarely been a better time to collect it. That's because the federal tax rate on most dividends is just 15%. Since 2003, when Congress cut taxes on dividends, more than 300 U.S. companies have initiated cash disbursements, and hundreds of others have raised once-token payments to meaningful levels. Last year, some 2,000 companies boosted their dividends.
Don't confuse dividend excellence with stocks that yield the most (yield is the annual cash dividend divided by the stock price). In fact, a high yield can be a warning that something is amiss with the company and that it is likely to cut the distribution. That was the case with both Ford Motor and General Motors. Because of big share-price declines, their yields climbed as high as 10% before both automakers whacked their payouts. In addition, some dividends may not be as valuable as they seem to be, because of the impact of taxes. For example, most dividends from real estate investment trusts are taxed at regular rates, up to 35%. REITs are perfectly fine for your IRA, but look for stocks that pay dividends that qualify for the 15% rate to stash in a non-tax-sheltered account.
It's not hard to find dividend-growth champs. Standard & Poor's, for instance, lists dividend "aristocrats," companies in S&P's 500-stock index that have boosted their dividends for at least 25 years in a row. Mergent, another supplier of financial information, names dividend "achievers," companies that have boosted payouts for at least ten years and have met other criteria. If you prefer to let a pro pick the stocks, we identify three solid funds on page 36 that focus on payout boosters. Below, we use four different dividend-growth strategies to identify eight promising stocks.
All-around champs
These are the companies that boost dividends year after year after year. S&P says that over the past 15 years, its 59 current aristocrats have produced an average total return of 13% annually. That exceeds the return of the S&P 500 by an average of two percentage points per year. Moreover, S&P's dividend royals have provided those superior returns with below-average risk.
Who are these overachievers? Many are banks and insurers, both of which usually pay high dividends. Financial companies rarely carry high long-term debt loads and don't need to invest heavily in research and development or in expensive manufacturing facilities. Therefore, they accumulate and retain a lot of cash. But some investors lump financial companies together with other plodders, such as electric utilities. That's a mistake.
A bank can be both a dividend champ and a growth company. M&T Bank Corp. (MTB) is a case in point. It has raised its dividend 18% a year since 1983. M&T's stock has been fabulous as well, with an annualized return of 24% since 1980. M&T's performance is all the more amazing considering that the company operates mostly in long-declining sections of upstate New York in and near Buffalo, where it's based, and Rochester. M&T's opportune acquisition of a scandal-tainted Maryland bank in 2002 gives it a foothold in a more-thriving area.
The aristocrats also include prosaic industrial firms. W.W. Grainger (GWW) sells 138,000 products, including motors, tools, building-maintenance equipment and worker-safety gear. With customers that range from small heating contractors to the U.S. government, Grainger is well insulated from troubles in any segment of the economy. The company raised its dividend 21% last year, marking the 35th straight year of payout increases.
Or look at Johnson Controls (JCI), a 122-year-old company that is changing radically. Once dependent on sales of car interiors to Ford and GM, Johnson has added industrial air conditioners, environmental building-control systems and lithium-ion batteries. The new lines, aided by healthy sales of car seats and dashboards to foreign automakers, are leading to record profits. Analyst Ronald Tadross, of Bank of America Securities, says Johnson is capable of boosting its dividend 15% a year for the foreseeable future. The strong earnings gains that will fuel the growing dividend should help Johnson shares achieve a higher price-earnings ratio -- one that is more in line with those of the best diversified manufacturers.
If you're concerned that a company that steadily raises it dividends will undermine future earnings growth, you can relax. "High-dividend companies tend to experience strong, not weak, future earnings growth," says Baruch College professor Ping Zhou, who, with a colleague, has studied market data going back 50 years. They also found that the relationship between dividend growth and subsequent earnings gains is much closer than the connection between share buybacks and future profit growth.
Huge boosters
Not until 1993 did Harley-Davidson (HOG) pay its first dividend. But once the legendary motorcycle maker got religion, it went, er, hog wild. Harley has boosted dividends 30% annualized over the past ten years and 47% annualized over the past five. The annual payout rate is now 84 cents per share. Harley's total payouts went from $41 million in 2002 to $220 million last year. The short-term outlook for Harley shares may be clouded by the aftereffects of a strike and current high inventories, but motorcycle sales usually vroom in the spring and summer, and so often does the stock.
Praxair (PX), a supplier of oxygen, hydrogen, helium and other gases to industry, is as obscure as Harley is celebrated. But it's another convert to the notion that bigger is better when it comes to boosting the dividend. In January, upon release of its 2006 results, Praxair increased its dividend by 20%, to an annual rate of $1.20 per share. Chief financial officer Jim Sawyer told Wall Street that "we expect something similar in size or a little larger" when the company releases 2007 results next January.
Praxair is a perfect example of how rising dividends and a fine earnings outlook feed on one another. The company has issued bullish profit projections for 2007 based on expected high returns on its investments in Asia and Latin America. Normally, a company might set aside the extra earnings to pay down debt, build more facilities or make acquisitions. But Praxair already has numerous expansion projects in progress and decided that deals would be too costly now. Praxair's solution to this pleasant problem: Remember the shareholders. A doubling of the dividend since 2004 is proof that Praxair hasn't forgotten them.
Great expectations
How do you find companies that may boost dividends sharply in the future? You can screen for ideas using the online version of the Value Line Investment Survey. The service, for example, lets you compare stocks with the highest "projected dividend growth rates" over the next three to five years with companies that have boosted their payouts steadily over the past ten years. The exercise produces a short list of compelling candidates, including Harley and M&T.
Two sleepers among potential dividend boosters are Fastenal (FAST) and Expeditors International (EXPD). Value Line expects each to boost its distributions 24% a year over the next few years.
Fastenal, a distributor and retailer of industrial and construction supplies, sometimes competes with W.W. Grainger. Expeditors manages air and ocean freight for shippers, which pay the company to find space on cargo ships and planes. Neither stock yields much, but some consider serial dividend increases to be an indicator of financial health and profitability, and both stocks have performed well. Over the past decade of rapid dividend growth, Expeditors shares returned a sizzling 32% annualized and Fastenal returned 15%. Both companies say they plan to persist with regular increases. "There's nothing magical about this, no great epiphany in the boardroom," says Jordan Gates, Expeditors' chief financial officer. "We just say that as we increase earnings, we'll be sure to raise dividends."
Expeditors and Fastenal are members of an exclusive club. They are among only 22 stocks caught by a Value Line filter for high past and future dividend growth, high ten-year returns on total capital (a measure of profitability), and high ten-year cash-flow growth. Among others in this august group are insurance broker Brown & Brown, Harley, medical-device maker Stryker and mutual fund giant T. Rowe Price. Historically, all have been fabulous stocks for investors to own at any stage of life and in almost any kind of market.
New believers
The reduction in dividend tax rates enacted in 2003 helped reverse a 20-year decline in the percentage of publicly traded companies that pay dividends. It also seems to have changed entire industries.
Take freight shipping, for example. Fleets of tankers and containerships have been converted into entities that promise both smooth sailing and steadily increasing dividends. For example, Seaspan (SSW), a fleet of 41 containerships, went public in 2005 at $19 and set its first full-year dividend at $1.70 a year. In January, it raised the yearly payout rate to $1.79 a share. Chief executive Gerry Wang says he's aiming to deliver a "very, very steady pattern of dividend increases," which he hopes will lead to steady share-price performance.
Thirty-eight of Seaspan's ships are leased for 10 to 12 years, which improves the chances that the company will be able to steadily boost dividends. As Seaspan acquires more ships, the company will make more money and earmark some of the increased profits for higher dividends, says Wang. Investors seem to be happy with the strategy, as Seaspan shares have risen to $26 in less than two years.
Seaspan is one of hundreds of new dividend payers. Not all of the newcomers will be able to boost their payouts year after year or win inclusion in a list of dividend aristocrats. But those that do will be sending a powerful message to their shareholders. As David Pearl, chief of U.S. stocks at Epoch Investment Partners, a New York City money-management firm, puts it: "There's no question that if a company grows its dividends and raises them every year, it's making a public statement and a commitment."
By the numbers: 8 companies that enjoy sharing the wealth
As the table indicates, growing dividends are not synonymous with high yields. But as long as their profits keep growing, expect the companies listed below to boost payouts. And that should bode well for share prices.
Expeditors Intl EXPD $44 $9.5 $0.22 0.5% 9 34.5% Harley-Davidson HOG 68 17.5 0.84 1.2 13 46.5 M&T Bank Corp. MTB 122 13.4 2.40 2.0 19 17.6 Seaspan SSW 26 0.9 1.79 7.0 1 N/AData to February 12. N/A not applicable; company went public in 2005. Sources: The companies, Value Line, Yahoo.
Technorati: , , ,

-->
My Dividends Are Bigger Than YoursMarch 8, 2007 on 9:47 am In 2) General No Comments

By Selena MaranjianMarch 7, 2007
I did an interesting little calculation the other day. You see, I own shares of Motley Fool Income Investor recommendation Johnson & Johnson, which I bought for about $43 each back in 2002. The stock has recently been trading for around $62 per share. If you look up the dividend yield for the stock, it's approximately 2.4%, a pretty respectable number. That's the yield you'd get on your investment if you bought the shares at the current price.
Not me, though. My dividend yield for Johnson & Johnson is approximately 3.5%. Even better: I suspect it might be 13% or more in just 10 years.
Let me explain
Remember, my purchase price was roughly $43 per share. If you take the current annual dividend amount of $1.50 (which is paid out in quarterly installments, like most dividends), and divide it by my purchase price, you get a dividend yield of 3.5%. Divide it by the current price, and you get 2.4%.
My yield is bigger because I bought the stock for less. The dividend is growing, too. When I bought back in 2002, the annual dividend was just $0.82.
Here's a quick look at J&J's quarterly and annual dividend amounts in past years, plus the increase of each amount over the previous sum:
Over the past five years, the dividend has grown by an average of more than 15% annually. (Stay tuned -- I'll soon tell you how you can earn great returns from this steady dividend growth.)
Future shock
The reliability of J&J's dividend and the strength of the company's business helps me project my dividend yield into the future. (The company sports 45 consecutive years of dividend increases!) I'll assume 14% dividend growth per year over the next 10 years. If that happens, the current annual dividend of $1.50 will turn into $5.50. Given my $43 purchase price, that gives me an effective 13% yield!
So my modest initial investment of not much more than $4,000 will be kicking out more than $500 per year to me at that time.
Fast-forward 20 years instead of 10, and let's assume that the dividend has "only" grown by an annual average of 12%. That would put it at $14.47, which would give me a yield of 34%! (If it grows by an average of 14% instead, that will give me an effective 48% yield.) It wouldn't be unreasonable to imagine that at that time (in 2027), the stock will be trading with a then-current yield of 2% to 4%. That means I'll have more than 700% capital gains to go along with my 34% yield.
How you can do it
These kinds of incredible gains can be yours, too, as long as you seek out solid, growing dividend payers and hang on for the long haul. You might think of Disney (DIS) as a relatively sleepy company, for example (or a dopey or sneezy one), but it has hiked its dividend by an annual average of 22% over the past decade. Here are a few other notable dividend hikers:
Enter symbol for stock info.
Are these all good prospects for investment? Well, some are better than others, of course, and there are probably even better prospects out there. If you find some solid companies paying growing dividends you should be able to rely on, you'll likely earn huge effective yields down the line. Not a bad deal, eh?
We'd love to introduce you to an even more promising group of dividend payers via our Income Investor service, which you can try for free. The picks are beating the market to date and last time I checked, they offered an average current yield of more than 4%. And if Johnson & Johnson has taught us anything, it's that it pays to buy our dividends now. Click here to learn more.
This article was originally published on June 15, 2006. It has been updated.
Selena Maranjian owns shares of Johnson & Johnson. Johnson & Johnson, Sysco, and Wrigley are Income Investor recommendations. Coca-Cola and Wal-Mart are Inside Value picks. Disney is a Stock Advisor selection. The Motley Fool is Fools writing for Fools.
Technorati: , , ,

Dividend Growth Stock Investing

Dividend Growth Stock Investing

Dividend Growth Stock Investing
The Investment U E-Letter: Issue # 600Wednesday, November 01, 2006
Dividend Growth Stock Investing: How To Get Solid Returns with Little Risk... Plus, 5 Dividend-Paying Investments to Considerby Mark Skousen, Chairman, Investment U
What do beer, cigarettes and drugs have in common?
If you said “vices,” you’re wrong. Blue chip companies have all adopted a superior shareholder benefit program that investors seem to love. It’s called “Dividend Growth” – a policy of increasing their dividend over time.
And, for investors, the idea of Dividend Growth Stock Investing is spreading like wildfire…
The following mature companies all raise their dividend every year, or almost every year:
Beverage Companies
Anheuser-Busch Companies Inc. (NYSE: BUD)
Coca-Cola Bottling (Nasdaq: COKE)
Cigarette Manufacturers
Altria Group, Inc. (NYSE: MO)
Reynolds American, Inc. (NYSE: RAI)
Pharmaceuticals
Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ)
Merck (NYSE: MRK)
Bristol-Myers Squibb (NYSE: BMY)
Financials
SunTrust (NYSE: STI)
Citigroup (NYSE: C)
Wachovia (NYSE: WB)
Bank of America (NYSE: BAC)
Giant Retailers
Wal-Mart Stores (NYSE: WMT)
Target (NYSE: TGT)
Costco (Nasdaq: COST)
Best Buy (NYSE: BBY)
Big Oil
Exxon Mobil (NYSE: XOM)
Chevron (NYSE: CVX)Since dividends have to come out of earnings, companies that adopt this strategy tend to start out conservatively. The payout ratio is typically 25% or less. But some large-cap blue chip stocks are paying out more than 50% of earnings in dividends.
The yield in dividend growth companies varies dramatically – from a low of 1% or less, such as AIG (NYSE: AIG), to more than 10%, such as Thornburg Mortgage (NYSE: TMA).
Some companies have been increasing their annual dividend for 40 years or more:
3M Company (NYSE: MMM) in St. Paul, Minnesota
Coca-Cola in Atlanta, Georgia
Colgate Palmolive (NYSE: CL) of New York, New York.
But here’s the question:
Can the Dividend Growth Stocks Strategy Help Investors Beat the Market?
Some investment advisors swear by dividend growth as the technique for conservative investors.
Lowell Miller, who heads up the money management firm of Miller/Howard Investments, is so taken with the idea that he’s written an entire book on it called The Single Best Investment: Consistently Creating Wealth with Dividend Growth.
He states, “Dividend growth is real. Neither dividends nor dividend growth are some propaganda from the company, nor some hype from a brokerage firm or newsletter writer, nor some error of judgment by a finance magazine.” He calls dividend growth investing “sensible, easy, and profitable,” offering solid returns with the lowest possible risk.
Why? Because companies that increase their dividend are constantly under pressure to perform well and earn a profit every year. If they start losing money, the board of directors will be forced to do something they hate to d decrease or suspend the dividend. Most avoid it like the plague, in part because it would mean a sharp selloff in the stock. And because most executives are paid today in stock options, the worst thing that could happen would be a bear market.
Most dividend growth companies have done well over the year. But there’s no guarantee it will keep a company out of trouble. Ford had an income growth plan, reaching 30 cents a share per quarter by 2001– and then suddenly had to cut its dividend in half. It’s now down to 5 cents a share.
How Investors Can Profit from Rising Dividends
You can either buy dividend growth stocks, such as in the above listing, or buy a rising dividend fund or ETF. Rising dividend stocks have become so popular that new “rising dividend” mutual funds and ETFs are coming out every year.
The oldest fund is the $1.8 billion Franklin Rising Dividend Fund (FRDPX), begun in 1987. New ones include the Ave Maria Rising Dividend Fund (AVEDX) and the Dividend Growth Rising Fund (ICRDX). And Vanguard recently began an ETF: Vanguard Dividend Appreciation (AMEX: VIG).
Franklin’s fund is ranked three stars by Morningstar, and has a low yield of only 0.95%. Even Ave Maria and Dividend Growth funds yield only 1%. It’s too early to tell how well Vanguard’s VIG is doing.
My favorite ETF is Morningstar’s Dividend Leaders Fund (AMEX: FDL). It’s weighted toward mega-cap companies that pay hefty dividends with above average growth potential. I noticed that its top 10 holdings are all rising dividend stocks. FDL has low volume, but is attracting interest. Its yield is 3.6%, and so far, the fund is beating the market with less volatility.
Take a look in the following chart…
Good investing, AEIOU
Mark